Corrections Policy

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Dev Digest is committed to providing accurate, reliable, and up-to-date information about software development, AI, and technology. We understand that technical content requires precision, and we take our responsibility to our readers seriously.

Types of Corrections

Technical Errors

• Incorrect code examples or syntax
• Outdated API references or documentation links
• Factual errors about software versions, features, or capabilities
• Broken or incorrect command-line instructions

Content Updates

• Framework or library updates that affect article relevance
• Deprecated methods or best practices
• Security vulnerabilities in recommended approaches
• Performance benchmarks that are no longer accurate

Editorial Corrections

• Spelling and grammatical errors
• Factual inaccuracies about companies, people, or events
• Misleading headlines or descriptions
• Attribution errors or missing credits

How We Handle Corrections

Minor Corrections

For small errors like typos, broken links, or minor technical inaccuracies:

• Corrections are made directly to the article
• No correction notice is added for minor fixes
• Updated timestamp reflects the change

Significant Corrections

For substantial errors that could mislead readers or affect technical implementations:

• A correction notice is added at the top of the article
• The original error is acknowledged transparently
• Updated content is clearly marked
• Correction date and nature of change are documented

Major Corrections

For fundamental errors that significantly impact the articles value or accuracy:

• Prominent correction notice with detailed explanation
• Complete revision of affected sections
• Consideration of article retraction if errors are too extensive
• Notification to readers who may have been affected

Reporting Errors

What to Include in Correction Requests

To help us address your correction quickly and accurately, please include:

• Article URL and title
• Specific section or paragraph with the error
• Description of the error and why it's incorrect
• Suggested correction if you have one
• Supporting evidence (documentation, official sources, etc.)
• Your contact information for follow-up questions

Response Timeline

• Acknowledgment: Within 24 hours of receiving the correction request
• Investigation: 1-3 business days depending on complexity
• Implementation: Corrections are published as soon as verified
• Follow-up: We'll notify you when the correction is live

Editorial Standards

Fact-Checking Process

• All technical content is tested in appropriate environments
• Code examples are verified before publication
• External sources and documentation are cross-referenced
• Industry best practices are researched and validated

Review Process

• Articles undergo technical and editorial review
• Code samples are tested across relevant versions
• Links and references are verified for accuracy
• Content is checked against current industry standards

Ongoing Maintenance

• Regular review of older articles for outdated information
• Monitoring of framework and library updates
• Community feedback integration
• Proactive updates for security-related content

Transparency Commitment

We believe in complete transparency about our correction process:

• All significant corrections are documented and visible
• We acknowledge our mistakes openly
• Correction history is maintained for accountability
• We learn from errors to improve our editorial process

Contact Information

Primary Contact: amanraj12.ar@gmail.com

Subject Line Format: "Correction Request - [Article Title]"

Response Time: Within 24 hours for acknowledgment